dc.contributor.author | Chitimira, Howard | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-04T09:29:02Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-04T09:29:02Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Chitimira, H. 2016. A Comparative Synopsis of the Enforcement of Market Abuse Prohibition in Australia and South Africa. African Journal Of Legal Studies, 9:46-77. [https://doi.org/10.1163/17087384-12342068] | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1708-7384 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1163/17087384-12342068 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10394/26948 | |
dc.description.abstract | In Australia, the market abuse prohibition is generally well accepted by the investing and non-investing public as well as by the government. This co-operative and co-ordinated approach on the part of all the relevant stakeholders has to date given rise to an increased awareness and commendable combating of market abuse activities in the Australian corporations, companies and securities markets. It is against this background that this article seeks to explore the general enforcement approaches that are employed to combat market abuse (insider trading and market manipulation) activity in Australia. In relation to this, the role of selected enforcement authorities and possible enforcement methods which may be learnt from the Australian experience will be isolated where necessary for consideration in the South African market abuse regulatory framework. | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Brill | |
dc.subject | Market manipulation | |
dc.subject | insider trading | |
dc.subject | enforcement approaches | |
dc.subject | market abuse | |
dc.subject | financial markets | |
dc.title | A Comparative Synopsis of the Enforcement of Market Abuse Prohibition in Australia and South Africa | |
dc.type | Article | |
dc.contributor.researchID | 25319655 - Chitimira, Howard | |