Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChitimira, Howard
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-04T09:29:02Z
dc.date.available2018-06-04T09:29:02Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationChitimira, H. 2016. A Comparative Synopsis of the Enforcement of Market Abuse Prohibition in Australia and South Africa. African Journal Of Legal Studies, 9:46-77. [https://doi.org/10.1163/17087384-12342068]
dc.identifier.issn1708-7384
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1163/17087384-12342068
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10394/26948
dc.description.abstractIn Australia, the market abuse prohibition is generally well accepted by the investing and non-investing public as well as by the government. This co-operative and co-ordinated approach on the part of all the relevant stakeholders has to date given rise to an increased awareness and commendable combating of market abuse activities in the Australian corporations, companies and securities markets. It is against this background that this article seeks to explore the general enforcement approaches that are employed to combat market abuse (insider trading and market manipulation) activity in Australia. In relation to this, the role of selected enforcement authorities and possible enforcement methods which may be learnt from the Australian experience will be isolated where necessary for consideration in the South African market abuse regulatory framework.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherBrill
dc.subjectMarket manipulation
dc.subjectinsider trading
dc.subjectenforcement approaches
dc.subjectmarket abuse
dc.subjectfinancial markets
dc.titleA Comparative Synopsis of the Enforcement of Market Abuse Prohibition in Australia and South Africa
dc.typeArticle
dc.contributor.researchID25319655 - Chitimira, Howard


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record