The requirements for a valid pactum successorium in an antenuptial contract: the curious case of Radebe v Sosibo NO

dc.contributor.author	Rautenbach, Christa
dc.contributor.author	Van der Linde, Anton
dc.contributor.researchID	11086890 - Rautenbach, Christa
dc.date.accessioned	2016-05-27T06:44:51Z
dc.date.available	2016-05-27T06:44:51Z
dc.date.issued	2012
dc.description.abstract	This note discusses some remarks made in Radebe v Sosibo NO 2011 (5) SA 51 (GSJ) (hereafter the Radebe case) - a matter heard on appeal in the South Gauteng High Court. The case dealt, in essence, with the question whether a contextual reading of a 'property exclusion clause' in an antenuptial contract could be construed as a valid pactum successorium (succession agreement or pactum de succendo) when one of the parties to the contract died intestate.	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Rautenbach, C. & Van der Linde, A. 2012. The requirements for a valid pactum successorium in an antenuptial contract: the curious case of Radebe v Sosibo NO. South African law journal, 129(1):22-32. [http://reference.sabinet.co.za/sa_epublication/ju_salj]	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	0258-2503
dc.identifier.issn	1996-2177 (Onlone)
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10394/17513
dc.identifier.uri	http://reference.sabinet.co.za/document/EJC54016
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	Juta Law	en_US
dc.title	The requirements for a valid pactum successorium in an antenuptial contract: the curious case of Radebe v Sosibo NO	en_US
dc.type	Article	en_US

Files

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1